Re: [Autoconf] Regarding Baccelli/Townsley Internet-Draft

["Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins at earthlink.net>]

Hello Ricardo,

We haven't gotten to the point of deciding whether to
use stateful or stateless address configuration yet.
We're still trying to get started, although I guess
things are finally resolving so that we will see some
progress soon.

My guess is that eventually solutions will be
developed for both varieties, depending upon
the network configuration and attachment.

Regards,
Charlie P.



Ricardo Schmidt wrote:
> Dear group members,
>
> I am in accordance with what is stated in the Internet-Draft
> adhoc-addr-model-00 by Baccelli/Townsley.
>
> Using the same email, I would like to ask: does the group only
> consider stateless address autoconfiguration? Or is stateful
> addressing also an alternative?
>
> Regards,
> Ricardo Schmidt.
>
> PS.: some may be surprise with my email, but yes I am following the
> group discussions.
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>
>
>