RE: [AVT] RTP Payload Format for EVRC and SMV

["Adam Li" <adamli@icsl.ucla.edu>]

Dear Raghavendra,

Thank you very much for the suggestion.

The RTP payload specified in draft-ietf-avt-evrc-smv.txt is very
flexible, and is actually designed to be able to accommodate additional
codec formats besides EVRC/SMV.

The Smart-rate codec would be a perfect chance and example for writing a
new ID that uses the extendable payload format defined in the EVRC/SMV
draft. If there is anything we can help on that, please let us know.

Adam


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: avt-admin@ietf.org [mailto:avt-admin@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Sagar,
> Raghavendra P
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:24 AM
> To: 'avt@ietf.org'
> Subject: [AVT] RTP Payload Format for EVRC and SMV
> Importance: High
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have read the draft for RTP Payload Format for EVRC and SMV
> (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-evrc-smv-03.txt).
I
> have a suggestion here for the authors.  Smart-rate (TIA/EIA/96-C)
codec
> (a
> TIA/EIA standard codec for CDMA and also predecessor to PureVoice)
also a
> variable rate speech codec with frame sizes similar to EVRC/SMV. I did
not
> find a RTP Payload format for this codec in RFC\internet drafts in
> WWW.IETF.ORG.  May authors look into this codec also to accommodate in
the
> RTP Payload Format for EVRC and SMV
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-evrc-smv-03.txt
Please
> let me know your comments.
> Thanks and regards,
> Raghavendra
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt