Re: [AVT] Re: RFC 2833: Is there a way to handle tones with a dur ation over 8 a pproximately seconds?

To: "Prabhu, Raghavendra" <Raghavendra.Prabhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [AVT] Re: RFC 2833: Is there a way to handle tones with a dur ation over 8 a pproximately seconds?
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:21:58 -0400
Cc: avt@ietf.org
List-help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>,<mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>,<mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Columbia University
References: <621F928C3A39D61185C700508BB26843072D95CE@fmsmsx101.fm.intel.com>
Sender: avt-admin@ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826


Prabhu, Raghavendra wrote:

Also, if we follow same logic, we set marker bit only for the first packet.

Yes.

Also the time-stamp should be changed to reflect where the next duration is
referenced from.

Yes; anything else wouldn't work well. If you didn't do this, the receiver would believe that the event is already over.

Correct ?

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt

References:
- RE: [AVT] Re: RFC 2833: Is there a way to handle tones with a dur ation over 8 a pproximately seconds?
  - From: Prabhu, Raghavendra