Re: [AVT] 2833bis - hook events

[Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>]

> Right, but they should not also be sending on-hook and off-hook events 
> as states
> since you would then effectively be sending the flash twice.

Certainly. I noted the exclusion, although I'd hope the temptation is 
low. I also added that receivers should ignore Flash if they are in 
explicitly signaled off-hook or on-hook state.

> My suggestion is to make the on-hook/off-hook events mutually 
> exclusive with the
> flash hook events (states) so there won't be any ambiguity between them.
> Otherwise, we need so say something about how to treat the ambiguity that
> currently exists.
>
> -- Flemming
_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt