[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AVT] RTP: Confidentiality mechanisms

To: Mark Baugher <mbaugher@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [AVT] RTP: Confidentiality mechanisms
From: Stephen Casner <casner@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:24:46 -0800 (PST)
Cc: AVT WG <avt@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <5.1.1.5.2.20030108140851.021d84a0@mira-sjc5-6.cisco.com>
List-help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>,<mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>,<mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: avt-admin@ietf.org

Mark,

>     Has any thought been given to dropping the confidentiality
> specification altogether?  Are there real implementations using it?

Indeed there are two independent interoperable implementations, or it
would have been removed for Draft Standard.  I think the description
of the existing mechanism is adequately qualified (as in constrainted).

                                                        -- Steve

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt

References:
- Re: [AVT] RTP: Confidentiality mechanisms
  - From: Mark Baugher

Prev by Date: Re: [AVT] RTP: Confidentiality mechanisms
Next by Date: Re: [AVT] Profile: Silence suppression is allowed by default
Previous by thread: Re: [AVT] RTP: Confidentiality mechanisms
Next by thread: Re: [AVT] RTP: Confidentiality mechanisms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread