RE: [AVT] Status of draft-ietf-avt-profile-new-12.txt

["Alan Duric" <alan.duric@globalipsound.com>]

 yHi Steve,

one further comment, in section 4.5.9:

"4.5.9 GSM-EFR

   ... The packing is specified in ETSI Technical Specification TS 101
318."

packing is referring to document that is made historical (since
Dec-2001, see
http://webapp.etsi.org/workprogram/Report_WorkItem.asp?WKI_ID=5874), and
I'm not sure how good practice is to use historical document as
reference.

Regards,
Alan
 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: avt-admin@ietf.org [mailto:avt-admin@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Stephen Casner
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:56 PM
> To: Magnus Westerlund
> Cc: bs@utstar.com; avt@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [AVT] Status of draft-ietf-avt-profile-new-12.txt
> 
> 
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> 
> > draft-ietf-avt-profile-new-12.txt is not expired as it is
> tentatively
> > approved by IESG. It awaits a few small clarifications on
> > draft-ietf-avt-rtp-new-11.txt. When these are performed the both of 
> > them will go to publication, if IESG approves these changes.
> 
> What Magnus says is true.  But in addition, I have submitted
> updated drafts rtp-new-12 and profile-new-13 as the means to 
> convey the clarifications to the IESG and the RFC Editor.  I 
> did this after receiving permission from our AD, Allison 
> Mankin, since normally a draft should not be updated after it 
> is reviewed and approved by the IESG.  The clarifications we 
> have discussed are substantial enough, especially when 
> combined with the things I fixed to comply with the ID-nits 
> requirements (like fixing two spaces at the end of sentences, 
> and changing the order of some of the sections) that I 
> decided trying to convey all of that to the RFC Editor in the 
> form of edit notes to be applied to the previous drafts would 
> not be efficient, effective, or pleasant.  I am preparing a 
> set of files for the IESG to explain the significant 
> clarifications and to make it easy to verify that the other 
> changes are insignificant.
> 
> Having refreshed expiration dates should also help folks like
> Bala who have been concerned and asked about it.
> 
> The new drafts will work their way through the I-D
> administrator's queue.  In the meantime, you can get them at:
> 
ftp://ftp.packetdesign.com/outgoing/casner/draft-ietf-avt-profile-new-13
.ps
ftp://ftp.packetdesign.com/outgoing/casner/draft-ietf-avt-profile-new-13
.txt
ftp://ftp.packetdesign.com/outgoing/casner/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-new-12.ps
ftp://ftp.packetdesign.com/outgoing/casner/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-new-12.txt

                                                        -- Steve

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt