AW: [AVT] Agenda for San Francisco meeting - Clearmode

[Kreuter Ruediger <ruediger.kreuter@siemens.com>]

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Colin Perkins [mailto:csp@isi.edu]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. März 2003 01:59
> An: avt@ietf.org
> Cc: casner@acm.org
> Betreff: [AVT] Agenda for San Francisco meeting
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Enclosed is the agenda for the AVT meeting in San Francisco. 
> Please send
> any comments or corrections to the chairs. 
> 
> Those who have agenda time scheduled are requested to prepare 
> a summary of
> the issues they wish to discuss, and to send this to the 
> mailing list ahead
> of the meeting. This gives those who won't be attending the 
> opportunity to
> post their comments and concerns, and potentially even reach 
> some consensus,
> before the meeting time is consumed. It also gives other 
> participants the
> opportunity to consider the issue in more depth. Summary 
> messages SHOULD be
> sent to the mailing list by Monday 10th March.
> 
...
 	
> 
> Thursday, 20th March at 09:00-11:30
> ===================================
> 
> RTP Payload Format for a 64 kbit/s transparent call	
> (Kreuter)          15
> 	draft-kreuter-avt-rtp-clearmode-01.txt
> 	See also the TDM emulation work in the PWE3 working group
> 

Last friday I've submitted draft-kreuter-avt-rtp-clearmode-02.txt
to internet-drafts@ietf.org. This is still in the queue ...
Basically I removed Nx64 kbit/s from my draft and fixed some typos.

After discussion with A. Vainshtein, one of the author's of
draft-vainshtein-cesopsn-05.txt (PWE3), Tom Johnson, who is 
working on a similar topic, and Colin Perkins we agreed that 
it makes sense to split the Clearmode handling in two drafts, 
where my draft focuses on 1x64 kbit/s and an according MIME 
type registration, and the PWE3 draft focuses on Nx64 kbit,
T1/E1 and up for CES services.

So according draft-kreuter-avt-rtp-clearmode-xx.txt, IMHO 
the only open item now is the content type. In discussion 
is "audio" or "application".

My intention for the IETF presentation is to get an agreement
on that topic, so that this draft can be advanced for IESG
approval.

Regards, Ruediger



_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt