[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[AVT] AMR is not free anymore?

To: avt at ietf.org
Subject: [AVT] AMR is not free anymore?
From: Raoul Mallart <raoul_mallart at yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:58:53 -0800 (PST)
List-help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>,<mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>,<mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: avt-admin at ietf.org

Was anybody aware that a licencing system has been put in place for AMR (RFC 3267) ?

See http://www.voiceage.com/amr.html

Any comment on the prices?

My comment in one word: WOW !

Best regards

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AVT] AMR is not free anymore?
  - From: Ross Finlayson
- Re: [AVT] AMR is not free anymore?
  - From: Greg Herlein

Prev by Date: RE: [AVT] Comments on draft-ash-avt-ecrtp-over-mpls-reqs-01.txt
Next by Date: RE: [AVT] The need for Offer/Answer sections in RTP payload forma t specifications
Previous by thread: [AVT] Comments on draft-ash-avt-ecrtp-over-mpls-reqs-01.txt
Next by thread: Re: [AVT] AMR is not free anymore?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread