[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[AVT] RFC 3611 question

To: alan at telchemy.com, magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com
Subject: [AVT] RFC 3611 question
From: Rajesh Kumar <rkumar999 at comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:06:27 -0700
Cc: avt at ietf.org
List-help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>,<mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>,<mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: avt-admin at ietf.org

Is there a reason why RTCP-XR uses sends RERL which it defines as ERL+ERLE but not ACON as defined in G.165?

In G.165, ACON = ERL+ERLE+NLP_LOSS.

Is there in implicit assumption in RFC 3611 that RERL also factors in NLP attenuation of echo?

Thanks,

Rajesh Kumar
Cisco Systems

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt

Follow-Ups:
- [AVT] RE: RFC 3611 question
  - From: Alan Clark

Prev by Date: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-rtp-midi-format-04.txt
Next by Date: [AVT] RE: RFC 3611 question
Previous by thread: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-rtp-midi-format-04.txt
Next by thread: [AVT] RE: RFC 3611 question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread