[AVT] RE: RFC 3611 question

["Alan Clark" <alan at telchemy.com>]

Rajesh

The intent in RTCP XR is that RERL includes ERL, ERLE and the NLP, and hence
it would have the same definition as ACOM.  The only reason for the
terminology difference is that "Residual ERL" is more intuitively
understandable than ACOM.

Regards

Alan Clark
Telchemy


-----Original Message-----
From: Rajesh Kumar [mailto:rkumar999@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 4:06 AM
To: alan@telchemy.com; magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: RFC 3611 question


Is there a reason why RTCP-XR uses sends RERL which it defines as ERL+ERLE
but not ACON as defined in G.165?

In G.165, ACON = ERL+ERLE+NLP_LOSS.

Is there in implicit assumption in RFC 3611 that RERL also factors in NLP
attenuation of echo?

Thanks,

Rajesh Kumar
Cisco Systems



_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt