[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Srtp-users] RE: [AVT] <From, To> and MKI, FRC 3711
hi
Using both mechanisms is a lot of complexity and I'm hard pressed to
find examples of when we would need two mechanisms, which do the same
thing. I don't like that final sentence in 8.1.1 in RFC 3711 because
complexity undermines security and using both mechanisms is complex.
From/To has the advantage of not adding a field to the packet, but it
has the disadvantage of insecure interactions with the AES counter mode
transform. MKI adds a field but does not suffer from this problem. I
would choose one or the other but not both.
As it is described below, use of both mechanisms is superfluous AFAICT.
Mark
At 05:56 AM 5/11/2004, Sylvain Latulippe wrote:
Hi,
My understanding is the following:
Both mechanisms can be used whitin the same session. When using MKI,
<From, To> mechanism can be used by the sender side for synchronizing key
transitions (re-keying).
For example:
A session is started and 2 keys (KEY_1 and KEY_2) are given to the session.
Session parameters:
KEY FROM TO MKI
KEY_1 0 10 1
KEY_2 11 x 2
The sender uses KEY_1 to encrypt packets with index 0 to 10. MKI = 1 is
also appended to packets 0 to 10. When building packet with index 11, the
sender switches to KEY_2 and appends MKI = 2 to the packet.
On the receiver side, <From, To> is not required in this scenario. MKI is
extracted from the received packet and used to retrieve the right key.
Sylvain
-----Original Message-----
From: avt-admin@ietf.org [mailto:avt-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Ofer Goren
Sent: 11 mai, 2004 07:35
To: avt@ietf.org; srtp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [AVT] <From, To> and MKI, FRC 3711
Hi.
In RFC 3711, section 8.1.1, it says that "using the MKI does not exclude
using <From, To> key
lifetime simultaneously".
As I understand it, both mechanisms can be used for the same session
simultaneously. However, does the <From, To> mechanism is MANDATORY to be
used every time (whether <From, To> is used or not), or can I omit it if
I'm using MKI?
Thanks,
Ofer.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?Fromdnemail3
_______________________________________________
Srtp-users mailing list
Srtp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/srtp-users
_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt