RE: [AVT] Comments on draft-ietf-avt-hc-mpls-reqs-00.txt

["Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS" <gash at att.com>]

Colin,

Thanks for your responses to Kristofer's comments.  Regarding your suggestions:

>   - The last paragraph of section 4 suggests a couple of places where extensions
>     to various MPLS-related protocols are needed. This may well be the case, but
>     we haven't yet done the design work to know for certain. Can the draft be
>     reworded to suggest that "new objects may need to be defined" and that
>     "extensions to LDP may be needed", etc?

OK, will re-word.
 
>   - The definition of the RFC 2119 keywords is in the wrong place. Can it be moved
>     to the start of Section 3, rather than being before the introduction (else the
>     RFC editor will have to do it)?

OK, will move.

Thanks,
Jerry

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt