RE: [AVT] Draft agenda for San Diego

[Brad Steinka <bsteinka at telica.com>]

Colin,

Several of the drafts in the agenda are not listed on the AVT Internet
drafts web page.

In particular, the RTCP XR MIB, Multiplexing mechanism for RTP and the
Multi-Flow spec.

Where can these drafts be located for review?

Thanks
Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: avt-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Colin
Perkins
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 7:41 AM
To: IETF AVT WG
Cc: Magnus Westerlund
Subject: [AVT] Draft agenda for San Diego

Folks,

Attached is a draft agenda for the AVT meeting in San Diego. Please 
send any comments, corrections or additions to the working group 
chairs.

Those who have agenda time scheduled are requested to prepare a summary 
of the issues they wish to discuss, and to send this to the mailing 
list ahead of the meeting. This gives those who won't be attending the 
opportunity to post their comments and concerns, and potentially even 
reach some consensus, before the meeting time is consumed. It also 
gives other participants the opportunity to consider the issue in more 
depth. Summary messages should be sent to the mailing list by Friday 
30th July.

We also request that all presenters send us their slides at least one 
day ahead of time, preferably in PDF format. This has multiple 
purposes:

   - It streamlines the presentation process by having the presentations 
on
     a single laptop.

   - It avoids the delay that sometimes occurs in getting the 
presentations
     sent to us after the meeting, for inclusion in the minutes.

   - It allows us to preview the presentations to see if they are 
following
     the guidelines for what should be covered during the meeting.

Agenda time is conditional on sending both a summary of open issues and 
a copy of your slides ahead of the meeting.

Those presenting new drafts: briefly describe the basic problem and 
your proposed solution, discuss known issues, limitations and problems, 
outline where you want input from the working group, and how you wish 
us to proceed.  When presenting work which has been previously 
discussed: describe only the changes from the previous draft, highlight 
unresolved problems, and propose future directions.

You are reminded of the requirements for disclosure of intellectual 
property relating to contributions, in RFCs 3667 and 3668.

We strongly encourage all participants to read all relevent drafts 
before the meeting, and to comment on the open issues raised on the 
mailing list.

Thanks for your assistance to try to conduct an effective meeting.

Colin & Magnus

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt