Colin,
Several of the drafts in the agenda are not listed on the AVT Internet
drafts web page.
In particular, the RTCP XR MIB, Multiplexing mechanism for RTP and the
Multi-Flow spec.
Where can these drafts be located for review?
Thanks
Brad
-----Original Message-----
From: avt-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Colin
Perkins
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 7:41 AM
To: IETF AVT WG
Cc: Magnus Westerlund
Subject: [AVT] Draft agenda for San Diego
Folks,
Attached is a draft agenda for the AVT meeting in San Diego. Please
send any comments, corrections or additions to the working group
chairs.
Those who have agenda time scheduled are requested to prepare a summary
of the issues they wish to discuss, and to send this to the mailing
list ahead of the meeting. This gives those who won't be attending the
opportunity to post their comments and concerns, and potentially even
reach some consensus, before the meeting time is consumed. It also
gives other participants the opportunity to consider the issue in more
depth. Summary messages should be sent to the mailing list by Friday
30th July.
We also request that all presenters send us their slides at least one
day ahead of time, preferably in PDF format. This has multiple
purposes:
- It streamlines the presentation process by having the presentations
on
a single laptop.
- It avoids the delay that sometimes occurs in getting the
presentations
sent to us after the meeting, for inclusion in the minutes.
- It allows us to preview the presentations to see if they are
following
the guidelines for what should be covered during the meeting.
Agenda time is conditional on sending both a summary of open issues and
a copy of your slides ahead of the meeting.
Those presenting new drafts: briefly describe the basic problem and
your proposed solution, discuss known issues, limitations and problems,
outline where you want input from the working group, and how you wish
us to proceed. When presenting work which has been previously
discussed: describe only the changes from the previous draft, highlight
unresolved problems, and propose future directions.
You are reminded of the requirements for disclosure of intellectual
property relating to contributions, in RFCs 3667 and 3668.
We strongly encourage all participants to read all relevent drafts
before the meeting, and to comment on the open issues raised on the
mailing list.
Thanks for your assistance to try to conduct an effective meeting.
Colin & Magnus