Re: [AVT] Contrans I-D -- Summary for San Diego

["John Lazzaro" <lazzaro at eecs.berkeley.edu>]

On Aug 9, 2004, at 7:54 AM, Colin Perkins wrote:
> > [1]  No IETF standards-track protocol defines either
> > "TCP/TLS/RTP/AVP" or "TCP/RTP/SAVP".

> My reading of the consensus when this was discussed in AVT and MMUSIC 
> was that there is no current use case for secure RTP over TCP/TLS - 
> and hence no-one willing to do the work. Accordingly, I suggest we 
> proceed with [1] for now, and take up further specification at a later 
> date.

OK -- once comedia passes its Last Call, I
can do a contrans revision to reflect any
comedia changes, and then I would think
contrans is ready to go for Last Call ...

---
John Lazzaro
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~lazzaro
lazzaro [at] cs [dot] berkeley [dot] edu
---


_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt