[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AVT] Post WG last call edits on the H.264 payload format: Editorial
Hi Colin,
We authors has received and our self founds some editorial issues that
needs to be fixed before submitting it to the IESG.
Miska found a couple of typos related to use of underscore:
Page 37, 4th paragraph: Change "max_mbps" to "max-mbps" and "max_dpb" to
"max-dpb"
Page 41: Change "max_br" to "max-br"
Page 44: Change "deint_buf_req" to "sprop-deint-buf-req"
Page 45, 3rd paragraph: Change "deint_buf_cap" to "deint-buf-cap"
Page 46, 3rd paragraph: Change "init_buf_time" to "sprop-init-buf-time"
Miska also found that the following paragraph in Section 7.2.2 is in
error and contradicts the definition of the sprop-init-buf-time and the
proposal is to remove the paragraph completely.
o Variable ts is set to the value of system timer that was
initialized to 0 when the first packet of the NAL unit stream was
received. If the deinterleaving buffer contains a NAL unit whose
reception time tr fulfills the condition that ts - tr > sprop-
init-buf-time, NAL units are passed to the decoder (and removed
from the deinterleaving buffer) in the order specified below until
the deinterleaving buffer contains no NAL unit whose reception
time tr fulfills the specified condition. Note that transmission
delay jitter should be taken into account in the calculations with
timestamps.
We think these changes does not effect the technical solution and are
all editorial or only effects informational text. Thus it seems that
these would not require a new WG last call.
Cheers
Magnus Westerlund
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB | Phone +46 8 4048287
Torshamsgatan 23 | Fax +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com
_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt