Re: [AVT] RE: <draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vmr-wb-03.txt>: sampling rate

[Colin Perkins <csp at csperkins.org>]

On 9 Sep 2004, at 22:21, sassan.ahmadi at nokia.com wrote:
> I think you are confusing people by frequently referring to the 
> internal sampling frequency of VMR-WB. As I said in my previous reply, 
> AMR-WB has the same internal frequency and NO where in RFC 3267 it is 
> mentioned or referred.

Exactly. And it uses the RTP timestamp in the standard manner.

> The fact that VMR-WB is capable of processing narrowband (8 kHz) or 
> wideband (16 kHz) media does not have anything to do with its internal 
> sampling frequency.

Exactly. This is why the RTP timestamp rate should be either 8kHz or 
16kHz, depending on the input source.

Colin


_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt