[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[AVT] Changes to the internet-draft submission process



Folks,

Note that the IETF is beginning strict checking of the format for internet-
drafts, starting on 28th September 2004. You are STRONGLY encouraged to use
the idnits tool available from http://ietf.levkowetz.com/tools/idnits/ (for
download, or as a web-based service) to ensure that your draft conforms to
the guidelines. Drafts that do not conform will be rejected.


Colin




Begin forwarded message:
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
Date: 20 September 2004 16:10:47 BST
To: IETF Announcement list <ietf-announce at ietf.org>
Subject: Checking of boilerplate for Internet-Drafts

Hello,

A bit before the August IETF, we announced that it was time to use the new
boilerplate from RFC 3667 in internet-drafts, and instructed the secretariat to
heck that boilerplate.
Due to some confusion, and the impending meeting, we asked them to stop checking
after a while.


But we have to move on.... it is now almost a year since RFC 3667 was
published, and the legal issues that the document was set to address ARE
important to the continued operation of the IETF.


I have therefore instructed the secretariat to check some items of the
boilerplate again, starting from September 28, 2004.

On the particular issue of the boilerplate that got changed between RFC 3667
and the "fixed" draft-ietf-ipr-subm-rights-fix, I have asked them to check that
statement is present, and that it contains words that indicate that it was
intended to be a conformant boilerplate - we will make those instructions
tighter once draft-ietf-ipr-subm-rights-fix is published, but not now.


Instructions for making conformant drafts can be found at the usual URL:
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt


Pay particular attention to the section "Notices required in internet-drafts".

(Note: Any recent version of xml2rfc should be compatible with these rules,
provided you use the "rfc ipr=full3667" directive)


If the secretariat finds a violation of the rules, the secretariat is to return
the wording of the violated rule to the submitter; this should eliminate
ambiguity about WHAT is wrong with a submission.


With the hope of being able to go forward without worrying,

                            Harald





_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt