RE: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-tcrtp-08.txt

["Yaakov Stein" <yaakov_s at rad.com>]

> You're comparing VoMPLS to VoIP, and I was comparing VoATM to VoIP.
> The weakness of VoATM is the minimum 53-byte packet size.  
> VoMPLS doesn't have that weakness, but VoMPLS still has 
> smaller headers than VoIP.

While Y.1414 is restricted to MPLS,
please take a look at draft-ietf-pwe3-tdmoip,
there the multiplexing is specified as either over MPLS, UDP/IP or
L2TPv3/IP.

Both of these are PW encapsulations, 
and so are essentially PSN agnostic.

> ROHC, by itself, doesn't work if packets are reordered unless 
> draft-pelletier-rohc-over-reordering-00 is used, and ECRTP, 
> by itself, doesn't work over multiple hops -- ECRTP needs to 
> be encapsulated (tunneled) inside of something else.  And 
> TCRTP defines one mechanism for such tunneling.

I agree that it defines ONE such mechanism.

Y(J)S


_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt