File header/magic number != framing in my book.
So, what do you mean by framing? In the examples I'm quoting, the media
data format is bitwise identical in both cases. The difference is that
it's framed in a file (and hence has a file header) rather than a series
of RTP packets (and hence has an RTP header); once you strip the framing
there is no difference in format.
And this will be my last message on this topic.
Which doesn't resolve the conflict between draft-freed-media-types-reg
-01.txt and existing practice. Much as you may dislike it, there are two
proposed standards (RFC 3267 and 3558) which register formats in the way
I describe. The change you propose is problematic for a significant user
community, which has previously registered these types in good faith,
according to IETF procedures.
Colin