Re: [AVT] draft-kerr-avt-vorbis-rtp-04

[Phil Kerr <phil at plus24.com>]

Hi Arthur,

Thanks for this.  The example in RFC 3385 is based on Verilog, which is 
less than ideal for the Vorbis I-D.  There is a C example in RFC 3309 
which I will have a closer look at.  What I will do, if it is best to 
document in the I-D itself, is to cover the polynomial as well as a C 
implementation and draw from the two RFC's as a guide.

Regards

Phil


Arthur de Castro Callado wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Can RFC 3385 be considered enough of a reference for CRC32 
> implementations, or is it desirable to have (create) another RFC 
> defining and naming all versions of CRC32 that MAY or SHOULD NOT be 
> used in future IETF standards?
>
> Thanks,
> Arthur Callado.
>
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > > I don't know if there is an RFC for CRC32 that you could simply > 
> > reference (after checking that it conforms to your implementation of 
> > > course).
> >
> > Now I know that there is RFC 3385 which carries an example 
> > implementation in Verilog, sort of awkward unless you're devising 
> > hardware implementations.
> >
> > I'd say that SHA-1 is better for any modern software implementation, 
> > but it's partly a matter of taste and opinion IMHO.
> >
> >
> > Linus Walleij
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt


_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt