[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-historic-01.txt
Colin,
Thanks for the comments.
In section 4 do I need to have the full text of the MIME type
registration from RFC3555 since the payload type I suggest moving to
historic is called H263
Roni
-----Original Message-----
From: avt-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Colin Perkins
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 10:11 PM
To: IETF AVT WG
Subject: Re: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-historic-01.txt
I have a few (mostly editorial) comments on this draft:
- The 2nd paragraph of the introduction says "Implementations using
the new
features of the 1998 version of H.263 shall use the format described
in
this document", however the draft doesn't define a format. I assume
this
is a cut-and-paste error; please fix
- The 3rd paragraph of the introduction explains that RFC 2429 is
being
revised to deprecate RFC 2190. Since RFC 2429 will be made obsolete
by
the new draft, it might be better for this draft to reference
2429bis,
being published at the same time as 2429bis?
- Also in the 3rd paragraph of the introduction, change "MUST" to
"must"
since this document doesn't make that normative statement
(RFC2429bis
does). You may then be able to remove section 2 entirely.
- Section 4 notes to move the H263 payload type to historic status.
What
is the exact MIME type to be listed as historic?
- Section 5: can you expand on the security considerations? Perhaps by
explaining where one can find discussion of the security of the
payload
format, and why this change has no impact?
Cheers,
Colin
On 27 Jan 2005, at 20:53, Internet-Drafts at ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> of the IETF.
>
> Title : RTP Payload Format for H.263 using RFC2190 to
Historic status
> Author(s) : R. Even
> Filename : draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-historic-01.txt
> Pages : 8
> Date : 2005-1-27
>
> The first RFC that describes RTP payload format for H.263 is RFC2190.
> This specification discusses why to move this RFC to historic status.
>
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rfc2190-to-
> historic-01.txt
_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt