Re: [AVT] Syncronization of co-located clients?

[lazzaro <lazzaro at eecs.berkeley.edu>]

Stephen Casner <casner at acm.org> writes:
> I don't think the SMPTE timecodes help unless they are representing an
> absolute time in the future, where the sender has made a prediction
> about the amount of time needed for propagation to all receivers and
> buffering time within each receiver.  That might work in a controlled
> LAN environment, but it is not a general solution.

I think it might make sense to revisit the ideas in the BBN protocol,
but start with the latency model of a modern wired and wireless LAN,
and define a simplified protocol for this special case.  Zeroconf is
an example of a protocol that limited itself to "networking in the  
small"
and was very successful, and I think speaker synchronization could
be just as successful ...

---
John Lazzaro
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~lazzaro
lazzaro [at] cs [dot] berkeley [dot] edu
---



_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt