Re: [AVT] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-xie-avt-rtp-anti-shadow-01.txt

[Colin Perkins <csp at csperkins.org>]

Qiaobing,

On 27 Sep 2005, at 20:08, Qiaobing Xie wrote:
> With the separate RTP stream approach, there apparently is no need  
> for a new payload format. What I was thinking about is whether  
> something needs to be specified in avt so that the sender and  
> receiver can signal each other the use of the anti-shadow  
> configuration of the two RTP streams, including the amount of  
> forward-shit between the two streams. Is this still within avt's  
> scope or should be done in the app space?

It might be AVT or MMUSIC, if anything is needed. I was expecting the  
usual RTCP synchronisation mechanisms would take care if the forward- 
shift though?

Colin

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt