Re: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-ulp-12.txt

[Colin Perkins <csp at csperkins.org>]

Mark,

On 7 Dec 2005, at 03:27, Mark Watson wrote:
> This is a very late comment and could perhaps reasonably be ignored on
> that basis. However, with the formation of the fecframe working  
> group I
> wonder if the description "Generic FEC" is liable to cause  
> confusion. In
> fact, what is specified here is a specific FEC scheme based on a short
> block parity check code, albeit a flexible one.
>
> So, I wonder if "Generic FEC" should be changed to "short block parity
> check FEC" or something similar ?

The draft updates RFC 2733 "An RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward  
Error Correction", and so should have the same title to avoid  
confusion that it is a different format.

Colin

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt