|
I just submitted draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-05.txt. It
should be available on the IETF web site in a couple of days. Colin
suggested that I CC the AVT list with my submission to give the AVT members
some extra time to review version -05. But I don’t know if it will
go through as the attachment was a little bit large. (If it does go
through, I want to apologize in advance for the large attachment.) In version -05, I have incorporated the changes suggested by
Nokia: The biggest change is the addition of a Congestion Control
section. I placed it directly after the Security Considerations section,
and added a paragraph to the Security Considerations section that links the two
sections together. I added “BI-picture” to the definitions
section. This is a special kind of B-picture, but to make sure there is
no confusion, in sections that talk about B-pictures (such as 3.4, 4.3) I also
mention that the rules also apply to BI-pictures. In sections 4.1 and 4.3, I added a paragraph explaining how
interlaced video frames are handled. I added a sentence to the Introduction section to explain
how Main profile differs from Simple profile. In the Media Type parameter definition of "width"
and "height", I added a paragraph calling out that for Simple/Main
these parameters must be identical to the actual width and height used, while
for Advanced profile the actual width and height may be lower than specified. Anders |
_______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Working Group avt at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt