Re: [AVT] Updates to draft-ietf-avt-ulp

[Colin Perkins <csp at csperkins.org>]

Hi Adam,

On 28 Feb 2006, at 21:31, Adam Li wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the comments. The draft is updated with the
> recommendations, and a new revision (-16) is just submitted to the ID
> manager.
>
> About Section 11 "Security Considerations", FEC can be applied  
> either before
> or after encryption. Both cases are valid cases, so I kept both of  
> them. As
> discussed in paragraph 2, when FEC is applied after, the FEC data  
> is secure,
> so no additional security measure is needed. When FEC is applied  
> before, the
> FEC data need to be encrypted as well. The rest of the section (from
> paragraph 3 and on) focuses on the security considerations for that
> scenario.

Is there any benefit to having both? It would ease interoperability  
if there were only one way of doing the encryption.

Colin

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt