Re: [AVT] Updates to draft-ietf-avt-ulp

[Colin Perkins <csp at csperkins.org>]

Adam,

On 1 Mar 2006, at 04:53, Adam Li wrote:
> Restricting that FEC has to be before or after encryption is too  
> limiting, I
> think, especially because the encryption can be in a lot of  
> different ways
> other than SRTP. That section is concerning about the security  
> consideration
> in general and thus it may be necessary to talk about the issues  
> one might
> need to consider if encryptions are done in all different  
> configurations.

If I remember correctly, all the other RTP payload formats make such  
a restriction. If there are current use cases for both orderings,  
then fine, otherwise I would suggest defining one method only.

Colin

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt