[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[AVT] Req:Doubt regarding ILBC codec

To: avt at ietf.org
Subject: [AVT] Req:Doubt regarding ILBC codec
From: "Viswanatha reddy" <viswanathareddys at gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:13:03 +0530
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Cix2d/nqnOUQLOh/jefg9ppkIPFP5wniyp+edmG0Lm24u+i6xDAIDZqI7fyGBBZTmmLvdRMC2X6gzza2Y4+HZxuXIbd8RRKm1bHxc3JNnx/6E32pOPDiHOmac8Yaa+0YFi5/sHUgXNiePjQ73CqQuMH0BmQeQ3CD2IlOt/kae1k=
List-help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

This is viswanath.I am porting ILBC floating point code into fixed point.

I got a small doubt about ILBC codec floating point.

In the floating point code they are taking the input as short which is in Q-15 form.
I don't understand this concept of taking q-15 input..

Please help me regarding this.

Thanks in advance,
Viswanath..

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [AVT] Req:Doubt regarding ILBC codec
  - From: rupesh.kumbhare

Prev by Date: RE: [AVT] Updates to draft-ietf-avt-ulp
Next by Date: RE: [AVT] Req:Doubt regarding ILBC codec
Previous by thread: [AVT] Proposed addition of time alignment for AMR in RFC 3267 bis
Next by thread: RE: [AVT] Req:Doubt regarding ILBC codec
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread