Re: [AVT] Proposed addition of time alignment for AMR in RFC 3267 bis

[Colin Perkins <csp at csperkins.org>]

On 2 Mar 2006, at 16:51, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard) wrote:
> Time alignment is only applicable to certain codecs in limited  
> circumstances, so it's not clear that a generic solution is  
> necessary or desirable.  Do you have other applications in mind?

The point, I think, is that it's not limited to only one codec.  
Therefore we should try to develop a general mechanism, if we develop  
anything. I'm personally unconvinced that this is worth the trouble,  
but if there is a need for it, a new RTCP message would seem  
appropriate, coupled with the feedback profile. Adding it to the  
payload format doesn't seem to be a good approach.

Colin

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt