[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-rtp-hdrext-01.txt

Hi Dave,

One question I had that this draft didn't seem to address is why creating a simple IANA registry of RTP header extension values would not solve this problem. Is it concern that the 16 bit address space would somehow not be large enough?

Thanks,
Alan

Dave Singer wrote:

This draft has no open questions and I hope I have dealt with the issues raised to date. It's a general technique applicable to any RTP stream, so it's worth a review from anyone using, or interested in, RTP. We'd like to move this along, as the SMPTE time-codes rely on it.



At 18:50  -0500 9/02/06, Internet-Drafts at ietf.org wrote:

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Working Group of the IETF.

    Title        : A general mechanism for RTP Header Extensions
    Author(s)    : D. Singer
    Filename    : draft-ietf-avt-rtp-hdrext-01.txt
    Pages        : 17
    Date        : 2006-2-9

This document provides a general mechanism to use the header-
   extension feature of RTP (the Real Time Protocol).  It provides the
   option to use a small number of small extensions in each RTP packet,
   where the universe of possible extensions is large and unregistered.
   The actual extensions in use in a session are signaled in the setup
   information for that session.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-hdrext-01.txt





_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt