[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [AVT] FECC



Thanks, that's what I thought. That basically means there is no additional camera control functionality that is standardized (other than that one defined by H.281), is that correct? (regardless of the transport)


From: "Even, Roni" <roni.even at polycom.co.il>
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 10:51 AM
To: ctrobianni at ecotronics.com>, <avt at ietf.org
Subject: RE: [AVT] FECC


Hi,

This is currently the only FECC defined and supported by Video conferencing systems.

The way to carry the h.224 frame with H.281 in RTP is in H.323 annex Q.

Roni Even

 

 


From: Cesar Trobianni [mailto:ctrobianni at ecotronics.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 5:25 PM
To: avt at ietf.org
Subject: [AVT] FECC

 

All,

I have a question regarding the standardization of the camera control for video conferencing and video surveillance using the SDP/RTP/RTCP combo. Is there anything out there? As far as I can tell I am only aware of the H.281 over H.224 over RTP by means of RFC4573 SDP signaling.

We are currently upgrading our proprietary protocol to support additional capabilities and came into discussion the already existent standards.

Feedback greatly appreciated, Thank you.


_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt