Re: [AVT] RFC 3984 offer/answer Question

["Murat Artun" <artunmurat at gmail.com>]

Hello,

inline...

On 8/13/07, Yuval Nissan <Yuval.Nissan at audiocodes.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I would like to clarify the following scenario:
>
>
>
> A and B use the same H.264 profile and packetization mode (this assumption
> is only for simplicity).
>
> A supports up to level 3.0, and B supports only level 1.0.
>
> A doesn't know the level supported by B, and it wants to start the
> negotiation as offerer.
>
>
>
> My understanding is that A needs to send in the SDP new attribute for each
> level from 1.0 to 3.0 in order to ensure interoperability. Is this correct?
>

This does not seem to comply with the offer/answer procedure. Do you
mean a new connection establishment attempt to take place after the
first that you defined above is somehow rejected or fails with a
reject in the SIP level?

>
>
> Regards,
>
> Yuval
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>
>


-- 
M u r at  A r t u n, MSc.
   Design Engineer

"be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others"

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt