Re: [AVT] Working group last call: JPEG-2000 payload format

[Colin Perkins <csp at csperkins.org>]

On 31 Aug 2007, at 15:56, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Colin Perkins skrev:
> > There was considerable discussion on the list in June about allowing
> > non-90kHz clock rates for the JPEG-2000 payload format. A new  
> > version of
> > the draft is now available, making the agreed change:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rtp- 
> > jpeg2000-16.txt
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000- 
> > beam-07.txt
> >
> > If you commented previously, please review to confirm the changes  
> > made
> > reflect the consensus. If there are no additional comments by 20th
> > August, we will request the IESG consider these drafts for  
> > publication.
>
> Even if late, I think it looks okay. I am missing some recommendations
> on not using timestamp rate below 1000.

That's a good point, and something we discussed previously. Can you  
suggest text?

--
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/



_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt