RE: [AVT] RFC 3984 Packetization 0 question

["Even, Roni" <roni.even at polycom.co.il>]

Rod,
Using FUs make sense if you reach a limit like maximum number of slices.
Otherwise you should try to build your NAL units so that they are
smaller than the MTU size.
Roni Even

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rod Hill [mailto:RHill at trinityconvergence.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 5:17 PM
> To: avt at ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [AVT] RFC 3984 Packetization 0 question
> 
> 
> 
> RFC 3984 states that
> 
> When the value of packetization-mode is equal
>                         to 0 or packetization-mode is not present, the
>                         single NAL mode, as defined in section 6.2 of
>                         RFC 3984, MUST be used.
> 
> But how does 6.2 handle Single NALs > Max MTU size. Surely use of one
of
> the  FU schemes is the only reliable way to send such a NAL, or are we
> supposed to rely on IP fragmentation/reconstitution to get the NAL
> across a network?
> 
>         Best Regards
> 
> 			Rod Hill
> 			Trinity Convergence
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt