|
I’ve had a quick scan of the e-mails
on the list since I sent some comments on the draft on 8th February.
Of those comments, the following five perhaps need some discussion. 1. Introduction and Scope – should
some of the text in the Scope be moved to the introduction? 6. Timestamps across sessions. These
should have different offsets, but should they be sampled from the same clock? 11. Various bits in PACSI, such as the A
bit. Can these bits be defined in a meaningful way without specifying
constraints on the contents of other aggregation packets than the one in which
the actual PACSI is present? 15. Repeated SEI messages in PASCI and the
other NAL units in an aggregation packet. These should be discouraged, but
there appears to be no restriction in H.264/AVC/SVC on repeated SEI messages. 25. In which stream should repeated SEI
messages be present (and other non-VCL NAL units). This is also open issue 9 in
the draft. Also, Alex raised the issue of whether the
S and E bits and TL0PICIDX should use the same flag rather than the X and Y
flags; and Jonathan and Colin mentioned the possibility of defining a generic RTP
extension for cross-session decoding. Best regards Mike Mike Nilsson Sirius House (B54-MH), Room 92 From:
avt-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Even, Roni Hi, The next conference call: February 19, at 7:00 AM PST,
17:00 Israel/Finland, 16:00 The conference bridge number is +1-678-7955235 Regards Roni. |
_______________________________________________ Audio/Video Transport Working Group avt at ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt