Re: [AVT] HDREXT (again!)

[Stephan Wenger <stewe at stewe.org>]

YES.
Stephan

On Feb 25, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Tom Taylor wrote:

> Cullen has returned the HDREXT draft to the Working Group because we  
> have failed
> to exhibit consensus on the registration requirements for header  
> extensions.
> Recall that the last time we posed the question, only Magnus replied.
>
> Please, we desperately need people to express their opinions. This  
> time the
> question is very simple:
>
> Do you find that the current text in draft-ietf-avt-hdrext-14.txt  
> regarding
> naming of header extensions and registration requirements is  
> acceptable? Reply
> YES or NO.
>
> Tom Taylor
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt at ietf.org
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt