Re: [AVT] HDREXT (again!)

[Colin Perkins <csp at csperkins.org>]

On 25 Feb 2008, at 14:42, Tom Taylor wrote:
> Cullen has returned the HDREXT draft to the Working Group because  
> we have failed to exhibit consensus on the registration  
> requirements for header extensions.
> Recall that the last time we posed the question, only Magnus replied.
>
> Please, we desperately need people to express their opinions. This  
> time the  question is very simple:
>
> Do you find that the current text in draft-ietf-avt-hdrext-14.txt  
> regarding  naming of header extensions and registration  
> requirements is acceptable? Reply YES or NO.

YES.

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/


_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt