Re: [AVT] Timestamp in UEMCLIP

[yusuke hiwasaki <hiwasaki.yusuke at lab.ntt.co.jp>]

Hi,

> Does this mean that the timestamp increment of the transmitted
> stream may differ from the timestamp increment of the received
> stream?

If you mean that whether the clock-rate of the sent and received
stream of a media type in a session can differ or not (asymmetric RTP
clock rate for a payload type), then the answer would be "no".

Best regards,
yusuke
--
============
Yusuke Hiwasaki, NTT Cyber Space Labs.
hiwasaki.yusuke at lab.ntt.co.jp
Tel: +81-422-59-4815 (Fax: +81-422-60-7811)

At Thu, 6 Mar 2008 14:24:38 +0200,
Michael Pevzner wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> The RTP UEMCLIP 04 draft defines the timestamp considerations in the following
> way:
> 
> ~In cases where the audio sampling rate can change
> 
> during a session, the RTP timestamp rate MUST equal to the maximum
> 
> rate (in Hz) given in the mode range (see Section 6.2.1).~
> 
> Does this mean that the timestamp increment of the transmitted stream may
> differ from the
> 
> timestamp increment of the received stream?
> 
> Michael Pevzner
> 
> AudioCodes Ltd.
> 
> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential material. They
> are intended solely for the use of the designated individual or entity to whom
> they are addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, use, distribution
> or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
> 
> If you have received this email in error please immediately notify the sender
> and delete or destroy any copy of this message
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt