Re: [AVT] Some comments to subsection 8.1.1 in draft-ietf-avt-rtp-svc-08

[<Ye-Kui.Wang at nokia.com>]

>> 1. In the following copied text, NTP timestamps of NAL units or 
>> operation point representations are mentioned. However, NAL 
>units are 
>> not directly assoicated with NTP timestamps, which are only directly 
>> assoicated with RTCP SRs. The NTP timestamp for each NAL 
>unit must be 
>> defined.
>
>The RTCP SR packets define the mapping between the two 
>timelines, allowing you to directly derive the NTP timestamps 
>from the RTP timestamps in each session. This is the standard 
>RFC 3550 semantics:  
>nothing specific to this format needs to be defined.
>

By defining I meant adding something saying that the NTP timestamp is
derived for each packet (according to RFC 3550) and each NAL unit's NTP
timestamp is equal to the NTP timestamp of the packet the NAL unit is
carried in. This makes the description better, and I think it is aligned
with what you said above. 

BR, YK
_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt