[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AVT] draft-boyaci-avt-app-sharing

This is presumably for those above my paygrade to decide, but the number of options seems fairly limited. The SIP-related groups are clearly inappropriate, XCON is, as noted, dealing with a rather different problem of conference management, leaving AVT and MMUSIC. I think either would work, given that they have the broad-based participation that would seem to be helpful for this type of work. 

I don't think setting up a new group is helpful for a one-draft effort.

Henning

On Nov 19, 2008, at 4:24 PM, Jonathan Lennox wrote:


Randell Jesup writes:

Well, this IS the Audio/Video Transport group, not the RTP group.  On
the other hand, most of application sharing isn't audio or video.


It depends what you mean by "video".  In the sense that what you're
sending is an image that changes over time, application window data
could certainly be considered to be video, even though it can have very 
different characteristics than "natural" video captured by cameras.

To be sure, the Human Interface (keyboard and mouse) part definitely
isn't audio or video.

I would definitely be +1 on application sharing being something worth
working on in the IETF, and +0.8 on doing it in AVT.

--
Jonathan Lennox
Vidyo, Inc
jonathan at vidyo.com




_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt