[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AVT] New draft of "Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions (RAMS)" available



Hi,

         The burst duration (8 octets) in RAMS-I message is in a single RTP ticks. And I note that from draft-01 on, the solution is payload-independent (is my understanding correct?). So, for non-MEPG2-TS payload, for example, H.264-NAL where audio and video content are encapsulated separately in two RTP streams with different ticks, does the duration indicated by this single ticks still work? Which stream does this tick belong to?

 

From: avt-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:39 AM
To: avt at ietf.org
Subject: [AVT] New draft of "Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions (RAMS)" available

 

There is a new draft of the "Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions (RAMS)" draft available at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-versteeg-avt-rapid-synchronization-for-rtp-03.txt

 

We have incorporated the changes from the technical breakout session in San Francisco. The major changes in this version of the draft include

1- Changing the document title to avoid confusion with other ongoing "synchronization" drafts

2- changing the message names to reflect the title change

3- clarification of the RTCP message semantics, including changes to the "Request" and "Inform" messages

4- additional description/motivation for the various message flows has been added

5- RTP/RTCP muxing has been added

 

 

We hope to make this a Working Group item, and will change the name of the draft to avoid conflicts with other "synchronization" drafts at that time.

 

Bill VerSteeg