Re: [AVT] I-D Action:draft-ietf-avt-rtp-rfc3984bis-08.txt

[Roni Even <Even.roni at huawei.com>]

Hi Charles,
I suggest you look at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes-03 and see if
it addresses your requirements. The draft should be discussed in MMUSIC but
it is supposed to address your requirements
Roni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: avt-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:41 AM
> To: Ye-Kui Wang; avt at ietf.org
> Cc: Tom Taylor; Roni Even
> Subject: Re: [AVT] I-D Action:draft-ietf-avt-rtp-rfc3984bis-08.txt
> Importance: Low
> 
> As written, I can see how the SDP negotiation is used to determine to
> the maximum capabilities of the receivers (max-mbps, max-fs, max-br,
> etc.). Once these maximums are determined, it is often the case that
> multiple combinations of frame rate and resolution are possible. For
> example, it may be possible to receive the following:
> 
> 720p at a low frame rate
> 4CIF at a medium frame rate
> CIF at a high frame rate
> 
> I do not see any mechanism to indicate a preference among these. It
> seems such a mechanism would be useful. Am I overlooking something.
> 
> Thanks,
> Charles
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: avt-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Ye-Kui Wang
> > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:54 PM
> > To: avt at ietf.org
> > Cc: 'Tom Taylor'; 'Roni Even'
> > Subject: Re: [AVT] I-D Action:draft-ietf-avt-rtp-rfc3984bis-08.txt
> >
> >
> > The changes compared to -07 are just those sent, by me, to the
> mailing
> list
> > on Thursday, 9/17.
> >
> > BR, YK
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: avt-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces at ietf.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
> > > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:45 PM
> > > To: i-d-announce at ietf.org
> > > Cc: avt at ietf.org
> > > Subject: [AVT] I-D Action:draft-ietf-avt-rtp-rfc3984bis-08.txt
> > >
> > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line
> > > Internet-Drafts directories.
> > > This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport
> > > Working Group of the IETF.
> > >
> > >
> > > 	Title           : RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video
> > > 	Author(s)       : Y. Wang, et al.
> > > 	Filename        : draft-ietf-avt-rtp-rfc3984bis-08.txt
> > > 	Pages           : 105
> > > 	Date            : 2009-09-21
> > >
> > > This memo describes an RTP Payload format for the ITU-T
> > > Recommendation H.264 video codec and the technically
> > > identical ISO/IEC International Standard 14496-10 video
> > > codec, excluding the Scalable Video Coding (SVC) extension
> > > and the Multivew Video Coding extension, for which the RTP
> > > payload formats are defined elsewhere.
> > > The RTP payload format allows for packetization of one or
> > > more Network Abstraction Layer Units (NALUs), produced by an
> > > H.264 video encoder, in each RTP payload.  The payload format
> > > has wide applicability, as it supports applications from
> > > simple low bit-rate conversational usage, to Internet video
> > > streaming with interleaved transmission, to high bit-rate
> > > video-on-demand.
> > >
> > > This memo obsoletes RFC 3984.  Changes from RFC 3984 are
> > > summarized in section 18.  Issues on backward compatibility
> > > to RFC 3984 are discussed in section 17.
> > >
> > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-rfc3984
> > > bis-08.txt
> > >
> > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> > >
> > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail
> > > reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII
> > > version of the Internet-Draft.
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> > avt at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4527 (20091020) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4527 (20091020) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4529 (20091021) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4529 (20091021) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com