[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[AVT] Comments on draft-johansson-avt-mcast-based-rams-01



Hi Ingemar,

I read the draft, I am not sure how simple this option is but first I have some general comments

 

In the last paragraph of section 2.1 you discuss timing between the main multicast session and the rapid stream. I am not sure how good it will work since the join request is not precise in term of timing.

The same goes for the suggestion to delay the multicast stream, I assume that this is an RS application decision but I think that there should be a warning that if the delay is too big it may cause the RR to send a retransmission request since it will think it lost a packet.

 

In 2.2.1 you have an Ed note about using SDP but RAMS-R is from the RR which does not send an SDP. The RAMS work using declarative SDP from the RS

 

In 2.2.2 the RS sends the multicast address in the RTCP message. I think we discussed this in port mapping and there was some consensus that RTCP should not be used to convey addresses. Maybe the RS can allocate the addresses in the SDP and in the RTCP just provide a label to the group

 

Regards

Roni Even