IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 25 November 2008 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <behave-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: behave-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-behave-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2949528C1C5; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:16:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E683B28C1BF for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:16:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.317
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.317 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l03FbZAPgEcF for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:16:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C3928C103 for <Behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:15:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so120342rvf.49 for <Behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:15:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J3sa9nakId16pqmQ91s3a4b5sea9z0sOi2LljaUheK0=; b=hYCheoW6uBHtJKvwSkz/UNk+h78yXmxvoAIi3QDU803trrtSPFdMwBVtBEq4wuSBNm 5jSeQyDBAjN92Y/gxpHzLwcmgqe6kRxzIJLiv1jEN1mOkJol+MP3Nh3EGdGoj9XIxT0z MIZ1S65KB6lXWe07SZozae/kmLtyWbV8NlrRI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=EHpquyEAW1P9zq9SpWQShWvZsB8Oye0Hh2yXzYbos1DLOJPwnTVGyEWvSEEM9HLJ3P aMUOFQTJl0HSlk/wmxN6qnCMLpAGk6fG/RPNa4hyNd0icSoiId60Ttu3zgwR9UeVr31o IXHpC7tzkIkpLC5ku5wYoPgUQ5G7XxNTVo3JE=
Received: by 10.140.201.8 with SMTP id y8mr2592779rvf.12.1227647740999; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:15:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8sm16098668rvf.3.2008.11.25.13.15.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:15:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <492C6AF8.20200@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:15:36 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>
References: <015301c94c53$de4ec2f0$9aec48d0$@net> <5DAC6217-98DF-4D27-859F-0626D9B2AD26@lilacglade.org> <024a01c94da8$6fc621b0$4f526510$@net><B9B09EE3-D5ED-4489-8CAF-7C2761403BFB@lilacglade.org> <492C2E50.9090700@free.fr> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A03015C5B4E@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <492D15A4.4030508@free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <492D15A4.4030508@free.fr>
Cc: "Wes Beebee (wbeebee)" <wbeebee@cisco.com>, Behave WG <Behave@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org, alh-ietf@tndh.net, Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org>, iab@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: behave-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: behave-bounces@ietf.org

On 2008-11-26 22:23, Rémi Després wrote:
...
> The already existing NAT66, which is derived from NAT44, and is stateful, is 
> named the "stateful NAT66" (SF-NAT66 or NAT66-SF); the new one, which is 
> stateless, is named the "stateless NAT66" (SL-NAT66 or NAT66-SL).

This still "allows" two different objects to exist in the market,
simply by defining two names. I think it is much better that
the distinction be between "RFC5xxx NAT66" and undocumented proprietary
NAT66.

Alternatively, I propose
Stateless Locally Useful Translation between IPv6 and IPv6 (SLUT66)   ;-)

  Brian

_______________________________________________
Behave mailing list
Behave@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email