Re: [BEHAVE] adopt draft-van-beijnum-behave-ftp64-06 as WG item

[Zhen Cao <caozhenpku at gmail.com>]

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Dan Wing <dwing at cisco.com> wrote:
>> Note that i raised some questions and do not think the current draft
>> is a solid basis, although chairs do not think they are fundamental
>> issues.
>
> Yes, I made note of the comments, and as I indicated in my reply
> they can be corrected.  Documents are not perfect -- or complete --
> when adopted by the working group.  Once the working group adopts
> the document, the working group has change control over the
> document and can direct the authors to make the changes the WG
> deems necessary.
>
>> I do not know what can be a 'fundamental' issue.  Thanks.
>
> For example, the technique described in the document will
> not work as expected / desired.
>
This is obviously true. But for documents which enter the adoption
procedure, i do not think such a fundamental issue may exist. If this
criterion has never been triggered in practice or even in practice, i
do not think it is meaningful.