On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Dan Wing <dwing at cisco.com> wrote:
Note that i raised some questions and do not think the current draft
is a solid basis, although chairs do not think they are fundamental
issues.
Yes, I made note of the comments, and as I indicated in my reply
they can be corrected. Documents are not perfect -- or complete --
when adopted by the working group. Once the working group adopts
the document, the working group has change control over the
document and can direct the authors to make the changes the WG
deems necessary.
I do not know what can be a 'fundamental' issue. Thanks.
For example, the technique described in the document will
not work as expected / desired.
This is obviously true. But for documents which enter the adoption
procedure, i do not think such a fundamental issue may exist. If this
criterion has never been triggered in practice or even in practice, i
do not think it is meaningful.
