Re: [BEHAVE] I-D Action:draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-03.txt

[Xing Li <xing at cernet.edu.cn>]

HUANG, JERRY (ATTLABS) 写道:
> -----Original Message-----
>   
> > From: Xing Li [mailto:xing at cernet.edu.cn] 
> > Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 8:30 AM
> >     
> > >   There is another comment here. I could not find any definition or
> > > references for "IPv6-mapped addresses" in the above paragraph (and
> > >       
> the
>   
> > > original paragraph in RFC 2765). It appears that it is simply a typo
> > >       
> in
>   
> > > the original RFC text that was copied over. Should that have been
> > > "IPv4-mapped addresses" instead (here as well as in RFC 2765)? It
> > >       
> seems
>   
> > > to fit the context.
> > >   
> > >       
> > The IPv4-mapped addresses is define in RFC5156, we will add the 
> > reference. The other address types (IPv4-converted and
> >     
> IPv4-translatable 
>   
> > addresses) are defined in draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-framework.
> >     
>
> My point was that the relevant text (both in the draft and in RFC 2765)
> uses "IPv6-mapped addresses" 
> (not "IPv4-mapped addresses") in that one place. "IPv4-mapped" is well
> understood.  I was wondering
> whether that was just a typo in both documents. Perhaps both should have
> been "IPv4-mapped addresses".
>   

It is just a typo. Thank you very much for the correction. xing

> Jerry Huang
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
>
>
>