On 10/19/09 9:51 PM, Elwell, John wrote:
For what it's worth, the draft-roach-sip-http-subscribe document may not go through a working group. It is far more likely that it will be published as an AD sponsored document -- which means that it goes directly from draft-roach-... to RFC...The reason for this new version is solely because the old one had expired. It still awaits draft-ietf references to replace the draft-roach and draft-griffin references, before it can be progressed.
On that front, I apologize for not being able to move the document forward the past few months -- a series of fire drills at my "day job," as it were, have kept me more busy than normal.
/a