RE: [bmwg] Is the BMWG a proper home for this I-D?

[Russ White <ruwhite at cisco.com>]

> My concern is that if the IETF does not address the question, (at least
> the portion where it has expertise), then other organizations will
> attempt as best possible to provide guidance. Which would be a less than
> optimal approach.

I think what we would need here is a specific draft that addresses the
concept of what a down network means... This might be better off as a
collusion between IPPM and BMWG, perhaps, since it involves real world
networks, but it also involves specific measurement points and etc.

> > This is really off topic, but I wonder if there might be the remotest
> > chance of something like an "Internet Operations Task Force" spawned by
> > ISOC.
>
> Well, if that is what it would take.... I am not familar with the
> flexibility of the ISOC on such matters.

We could discuss this with the AD's, and see what their opinion is.

:-)

Russ


__________________________________
riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone



_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg